0.03/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 07:15:24 EDT 2024
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.21/0.47	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.21/0.48	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bdj0ZBjWw3/E---3.1_22654.p
0.21/0.50	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# full_lambda_10 with pid 22738 completed with status 0
0.21/0.50	# Result found by full_lambda_10
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true)
0.21/0.50	# Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
0.21/0.50	# partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF21-SSSFFSBN
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 98s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# post_as_ho12 with pid 22742 completed with status 0
0.21/0.50	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true)
0.21/0.50	# Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
0.21/0.50	# partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF21-SSSFFSBN
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 98s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.21/0.50	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# Proof found!
0.21/0.50	# SZS status Theorem
0.21/0.50	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_22, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_23, type, lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_24, type, lCorina_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_25, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_26, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_27, type, wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_28, type, husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_29, type, inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_30, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(con, conjecture, ?[X5:$i > $i > $o]:((~(((X5)=(^[X6:$i, X7:$i]:(($true)))))&(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((X5 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bdj0ZBjWw3/E---3.1_22654.p', con)).
0.21/0.50	thf(ax3, axiom, ![X8:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X8 @ (($true)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bdj0ZBjWw3/E---3.1_22654.p', ax3)).
0.21/0.50	thf(ax5, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bdj0ZBjWw3/E---3.1_22654.p', ax5)).
0.21/0.50	thf(ax2, axiom, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i > $i > $o]:((![X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X4)<=>(X1 @ X4 @ X3)))<=(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X2 @ X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bdj0ZBjWw3/E---3.1_22654.p', ax2)).
0.21/0.50	thf(ax4, axiom, ?[X6:$i]:(~((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X6))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bdj0ZBjWw3/E---3.1_22654.p', ax4)).
0.21/0.50	thf(ax1, axiom, (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bdj0ZBjWw3/E---3.1_22654.p', ax1)).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X5:$i > $i > $o]:((((X5)!=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:($true)))&((~(X5 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((X5 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X16:$i > $i > $o]:((((~(X16 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|(X16 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|((X16)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:($true))))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X16 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|((X16)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:($true)))))&((~(X16 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true)|((X16)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:($true))))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true)|((X16)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:($true))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X17:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X17 @ $true)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax3])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o]:((((X1)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true))))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X3:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X3 @ (($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_11, axiom, ((~(wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax5])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o]:((((X1)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o]:((((X1)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))|~((X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_14, plain, ((~(wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X4)|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i > $i > $o]:(((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X2 @ X1)=>![X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X4)<=>(X1 @ X4 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o]:((((X1)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))|~((X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_10])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_18, plain, ((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_20, plain, ?[X6:$i]:(~(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X6)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax4])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_21, plain, ![X19:$i > $i > $o, X20:$i > $i > $o, X21:$i, X22:$i]:(((~(X20 @ X21 @ X22)|(X19 @ X22 @ X21)|~(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X20 @ X19))&(~(X19 @ X22 @ X21)|(X20 @ X21 @ X22)|~(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X20 @ X19)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:$i, X1:$i > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X4)|~((X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_23, plain, (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_24, plain, ~(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ esk1_0), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X4:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ X4 @ X3)|~((X1 @ X3 @ X4))|~((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_26, plain, (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X4:$i]:((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ X4)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_28, plain, ~((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_29, plain, ![X3:$i, X4:$i]:((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ X4)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26]), c_0_27])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_30, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_29])]), ['proof']).
0.21/0.50	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.21/0.50	# Parsed axioms                        : 15
0.21/0.50	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 9
0.21/0.50	# Initial clauses                      : 11
0.21/0.50	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
0.21/0.50	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
0.21/0.50	# Processed clauses                    : 33
0.21/0.50	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.21/0.50	# ...subsumed                          : 4
0.21/0.50	# ...remaining for further processing  : 28
0.21/0.50	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Backward-subsumed                    : 3
0.21/0.50	# Backward-rewritten                   : 3
0.21/0.50	# Generated clauses                    : 43
0.21/0.50	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 27
0.21/0.50	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.21/0.50	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.21/0.50	# Paramodulations                      : 11
0.21/0.50	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.21/0.50	# NegExts                              : 0
0.21/0.50	# Equation resolutions                 : 2
0.21/0.50	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.21/0.50	# Total rewrite steps                  : 8
0.21/0.50	# ...of those cached                   : 2
0.21/0.50	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.21/0.50	# Current number of processed clauses  : 13
0.21/0.50	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.21/0.50	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.21/0.50	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.21/0.50	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 8
0.21/0.50	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
0.21/0.50	# ...number of literals in the above   : 25
0.21/0.50	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.21/0.50	# Current number of archived clauses   : 15
0.21/0.50	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
0.21/0.50	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
0.21/0.50	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.21/0.50	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
0.21/0.50	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.21/0.50	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
0.21/0.50	# BW rewrite match successes           : 3
0.21/0.50	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.21/0.50	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.21/0.50	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1896
0.21/0.50	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 154
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.50	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.21/0.50	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.21/0.50	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.21/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.50	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.21/0.50	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.21/0.50	# Total time               : 0.011 s
0.21/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
0.21/0.50	% E---3.1 exiting
0.21/0.50	% E exiting
0.21/0.50	EOF